Override vote for Norris School in Southampton fails

By CAITLIN ASHWORTH

@kate_ashworth

Published: 06-30-2017 12:53 AM

SOUTHAMPTON — Voters on Thursday shot down a $110,000 override for funding additional staff and curriculum materials at the William E. Norris School.

The proposed tax levy failed by a 435-350 vote, according to Town Clerk Janine Domina. The override would have funded a special education team leader and math interventionist as well as supplies for the elementary school.

“The school needed the money to fund necessary positions to support the special education staff and properly educate the children,” School Committee Chairwoman Erin Couture wrote in a message. “The unfortunate part is that as the school gets funded less and less, and services suffer, people will stop moving into town and all tax payers will suffer through their property values.”

Couture said the failed vote was a disappointment.

“What amounted to approximately a $50 increase for the average person to fund an extra $100,000 to the school seemed doable and not overly taxing,” she said. “However, it seems apparent that others in town didn’t see it that way.”

The school’s $4 million budget is an 3 percent increase from fiscal 2017. It allows the school to offer the same services as the year prior, but school officials say it lacks money for necessary curriculum and supplies as well as additions to staff to provide a tiered intervention and support structure.

Caitlin Ashworth can be reached at cashworth@gazettenet.com.

]]>

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Locking up carbon for good: Easthampton inventor’s CO2 removal system turns biomass into biochar
Northampton man will go to trial on first-degree murder charge after plea agreement talks break down
Police report details grisly crime scene in Greenfield
Area property deed transfers, April 25
Advancing water treatment: UMass startup Elateq Inc. wins state grant to deploy new technology
Super defers Amherst middle school principal pick to successor; one finalist says decision is retaliation for lawsuit