An aerial view of W.D. Cowls Inc. solar arrays in Shutesbury. The company hoping to build a larger solar facility in town announced last week that it is pausing the project following a recent court ruling. Credit: Submitted photo

SHUTESBURY — Following the recent dismissal of a Land Court lawsuit challenging the town’s bylaws for siting of large-scale solar installations, PureSky Energy is confirming that five clean energy projects proposed for about 190 acres of Shutesbury woodland are being paused.

While the company announced in a statement last Wednesday that it remains committed to supporting the state’s clean energy initiatives through both solar and battery storage projects, broader policy and regulatory headwinds are cited as ongoing challenges.

Specifically, the Solar Massachusetts Renewable Target, or SMART program, the state’s primary incentive mechanism, supporting the buildout of solar across the state, has a declining rate model not keeping pace with rising costs for land, interconnection and equipment. That issue is coupled with federal policy updates making it harder to finance projects like those proposed in Shutesbury.

“There are very few areas in the commonwealth that are feasible to reach its clean energy goals,” said Derek Moretz, vice president of development of PureSky Energy. “We respect the town’s conservation goals, but it is clear that systemic reforms are needed for Massachusetts to source its own energy.”

The project was first announced in 2021, with the possibility of bringing 45 megawatts of power, enough to power 5,000 households, from five parcels owned by W. D. Cowls, Inc. Those were three parcels on Pratt Corner Road, one on Leverett Road and one on Montague Road.

A representative for the company, then known as Amp Solar Development of Ontario, Canada before being taken over by PureSky, suggested that it would be the biggest solar development in the state, and under a municipal partnership model would generate $450,000 in taxes to the town in the first year as payment in lieu of taxes.

But two years later the developer and landowner took the town to Land Court, arguing the town’s bylaws were overly restrictive. Those bylaws had been adopted in May 2008 and amended in June 2021.

PureSky indicates it is now refocusing its resources toward communities across the state that are eager to support renewable energy infrastructure, and share in what it calls “the benefits of clean, reliable and affordable power.”

Scott Merzbach is a reporter covering local government and school news in Amherst and Hadley, as well as Hatfield, Leverett, Pelham and Shutesbury. He can be reached at smerzbach@gazettenet.com or 413-585-5253.