FERC urged to slow down pipeline process at packed hearing in Greenfield



Last modified: Monday, August 10, 2015

GREENFIELD — Federal regulators got an earful Wednesday night from nearly 600 people at an environmental scoping hearing on Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.’s proposed Northeast Energy Direct project.

Calling on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to postpone the scoping process that will guide the project’s planned environmental impact statement were the region’s entire state legislative delegation, Congressman James McGovern and many others of the dozens of people who signed up late in the afternoon to speak in a nearly packed Greenfield Middle School auditorium. The company plans to file an application in October and have the pipeline in service in the fall of 2018.

The legislative delegation presented prepared testimony, read by legislative aide Chris Capucci, that called for suspension of the scoping process, which FERC has scheduled to end on Aug. 31.

TGP’s filing just last Friday of a 79-volume draft environmental report on the nearly $5 billion project, with more than 6,500 pages of detail and maps, is just cause for the federal agency to restart the public process, the lawmakers argued. The process began with hearings July 14 in Pennsylvania and New York, included a Pittsfield hearing Tuesday night, and continues Thursday with hearings in Milford, N.H., and New Britain, Conn.

“Despite the lateness of the filing of these reports, they are incomplete, and omit critical information that is necessary for a thorough  and accurate review of the impacts of this proposed project in our communities,” said the testimony by Sens. Stanley Rosenberg and Benjamin Downing, as well as Reps. Stephen Kulik, Paul Mark, Gailanne Cariddi and Susannah Whipps-Lee.

McGovern had a statement read by his aide cautioning, “As currently proposed, the NED project crosses miles of pristine land that has been protected by state and federal dollars. ... It should be protected from the construction of a pipeline which would run directly through it.”

Others who spoke Wednesday night and had prepared testimony in advance echoed the legislators’ call for postponement.

Among them was Franklin Council of Governments Executive Director Linda Dunlavy, who called for FERC to evaluate the need for the pipeline.

“Even with the recently proposed reduction in pipeline size to 30 inches ... this pipeline project still has only 38 percent of its capacity committed. ... In the absence of a demonstration of need, FERC lacks authority to approve the project.”

FERC Branch Chief James Martin, one of three staff members who directed the meeting that went on beyond 10 p.m., said outside of the session that the scoping process is preliminary and that his agency would continue to accept public comments beyond the Aug. 31 deadline.

“We’ll take comments after the application is filed,” he said, emphasizing that people can also file comments in writing. “We’ll continue to take comments up to the point that we can no longer roll them into the draft.”

Still, he said he understood why people would feel like the process chugs along no matter what happens.

“The 79 volumes of this report have 6,571 pages of maps, tables and technical drawings, but also still contain enormous gaps in information, like a Horizontal Directional Drill Plan that consists of four pages containing one sentence stating that the plan is yet to come, and over 10,000 instances of “to be determined”in tables that should be filled with actual information that we can evaluate,” said Rosemary Wessel of Cummington, a founder of the opposition group No Fracked Gas in Mass. “We had four months to review the previous Resource Reports filed in March, and now, with a larger, more complex set we have just five days? We call on FERC to do the right thing.”

Wessel also called on FERC to prevent what she called an “illegal segmentation” of TGP’s NED and Connecticut expansion projects, “which share at least two of the few customers they have. ... You must review the overall Northeast expansion by Kinder Morgan as a single project to remain within the law.”

The project would include about 64 miles of pipeline in Massachusetts, entering the state at Hancock and largely located within a 20-foot path along electric power line rights of way.

TGP is asking FERC to grant a certificate for the project one year from its planned October application, with plans to begin construction in January 2017.

About 34 miles of the project would be built across Ashfield, Conway, Shelburne, Deerfield, Montague, Erving, Northfield and Warwick and include a compressor station on 10 acres of a 156.3-acre Gulf Road parcel in Northfield.

Greater Northfield Watershed Association President Andrew Vernon, in testimony he planned to present, told FERC, “The entire proposal is ill-conceived for many reasons.”

In Northfield, where a planned compressor station for the project was recently reduced in size from 80 to 41 horsepower to reflect a reduction in capacity from 2.2 billion to 1.3 billion cubic feet a day, he said, the planned station is “perched above several water sources,” with spills and settling emissions possible.

“The justification for the placement of the proposed stationas faulty from the start. Just because the power line right of way lies on the ridge above  our town does not automatically mean that this is a good spot for the proposed project,” he said.

Deerfield Selectman Carolyn Shores Ness said that TGP’s report omitted critical details about planned horizontal drilling beneath the Deerfield and Connecticut rivers, Interstate 91 and railroad tracks.

While the session was dominated by those opposing the pipeline, raising concerns about noise and light pollution, concerns about the impact on underground water sources, historical resources, geology, and endangered species, there was a contingent of dozens of labor union representatives who voiced support for the project.

Tom Andrews, business manager for Massachusetts Building Trades Laborers Local 596, said that although he believes in renewable energy and protection of the environment, he is primarily interested in seeing the creation of at least 500 local jobs.

But he also said that while fossil fuels move through the area on rail and trucks, the proposed pipeline would bring natural gas to the region safely underground, lowering energy costs in the process.

Chelsea Furlon of Charlemont, another union laborer, told the panel, “We need new infrastructure. We need more jobs. We need industry. Economic growth ... I support this pipeline, and I live here, too.”

Other speakers called for “environmental justice” and for protection of sensitive resources like Montague Plains, sacred Native American ceremonial stone landscapes and the National Scenic Trail.

As people waved away the heat with green hand fans that told those on the auditorium stage, “FERC do your job,” Conway Select Board member Jim Moore described what he called the profit-driven energy industry’s destruction of the national environment and said, “You have the opportunity to begin to make a difference, and I appeal to you to use that opportunity.”


 


Daily Hampshire Gazette Office

115 Conz Street
Northampton, MA 01061
413-584-5000

 

Copyright © 2020 by H.S. Gere & Sons, Inc.
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy