Daily Hampshire Gazette - Established 1786
Cloudy
34°
Cloudy
Hi 34° | Lo 19°

Don Lesser: Limiting gun ownership need not abridge rights

To the editor:

With regards to a March 22 letter (“Second Amendment protects gun ownership”), let me correct several inaccuracies.

First, the militia was not, at the time of the writing of the Constitution, designed to protect the citizens against their government. It was to form a standing army to protect the state against external threats. The fiction that the militia was designed to protect the citizens against the government is used to justify unlimited gun ownership by individuals who believe the government is somehow coming after them and, more laughably, that a few automatic weapons will protect them against the U.S. Army.

Second, the writer cites Switzerland as a paragon of gun control. It is true that nearly every adult is part of Switzerland’s militia (which it has in lieu of a standing army) and that they all take their weapons, including machine guns, home. However, since 2007, no one is allowed to possess ammunition for these weapons at home. Any ammunition purchased at a gun range must be used there.

Hitler opted not to invade Switzerland because he was afraid of the militia and its machine guns. Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, a much larger and much better armed adversary, without much hesitation. Switzerland served as an economic and diplomatic go-between for the Allies and Axis powers during the war, which is why Hitler left it alone. No doubt if he had won World War II, Switzerland would have been subsumed into the Nazi empire.

The First Amendment is already limited by restrictions on what citizens can say and do (Shouting “Fire!” in a theater, child pornography, libel laws). Pets, automobiles, food processors, elevators and dozens more modern conveniences are licensed and inspected, and owners and users are often required to pass competency tests before operating them. I see no abridgement of personal rights for the government to establish reasonable limits on gun ownership.

Don Lesser

Amherst

Legacy Comments1

This letter addresses some of the prominent issues many nonprofits claim are reasons to oppose gun safety concerns. Organizations such as Institute for Legislative Action, Firearms Policy Coalition, Gun Owners of America, and Second Amendment Foundation are only a handful of the nonprofits lobbying against any legislature moving towards gun safety. They also work against legislature that would provide adequate funds for various law enforcement agencies at a federal and local level to enforce any existing laws regarding background checks. Firearms Policy Coalition is actively working against a bill in the House of Representatives that would require a license in order to possess any handgun or any semiautomatic firearm that can accept any detachable ammunition feeding device. The list goes on and on and we need more sane responses as this letter.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.