Daily Hampshire Gazette - Established 1786
Hi 44° | Lo 25°

Sally Pick: ‘Compromise’ bill takes wrong turn on photovoltaics

This array is newly installed on Mill Valley Road in Hadley.

JERREY ROBERTS This array is newly installed on Mill Valley Road in Hadley. Purchase photo reprints »

As the 2012 Solarize Montague coordinator and an energy consultant, I see this “compromise” bill as a barrier to our continued adoption of smaller scale solar.

While the bill has positive language removing the net metering cap to allow all solar installations to receive credit at a retail rate from utilities for their PV production, the utilities would receive significant benefits for this concession. For example, H 4185 would replace the solar renewable energy certificate (SREC) program, which has propelled the Massachusetts photovoltaics market, with an incentive administered by the utilities. SRECs drive investment in solar because they result in a short payback period.

The bill could prevent owners from sizing photovoltaics to exceed their use, in order to share solar electricity with others or cover future demands, like electric vehicles and expanded business operations.

All electricity customers would be charged a new monthly fee with no limits in the legislation, supposedly to cover the costs of PV to the utilities. The fee does not recognize the benefits of solar, including avoided system expansion.

I call on the Massachusetts House to address the current bill’s obstacles to smaller-scale solar investment. If that is not an option, then they should pass the bill only to remove the net metering cap and create an inclusive process for revising the rest of the legislation, including local solar businesses, solar owners and community shared solar developers at the table.

Anything less will put the growth of photovoltaics at risk of severe decline and would be counter to our state’s commitment to clean energy.

Sally Pick served as the coordinator for Solarize Montague.

Legacy Comments2

Solar only works when it is heavily subsidized. Ending the subsidies forces people to realize that until solar panels can actually convert more electricity than the cost to build, they are a net loss as an energy solution.

Sally has legitimate concerns about the unintended consequences of this bill, H4185. No need to rush into what could ultimately throttle back the rate of solar adoption in Massachusetts with a minimum bill that effectively gives the regulated utilities a zero interest loan from solar adopters and prevents 12% of Massachusetts residents who live in Municipal Light Plant towns to participate in the new proposed solar incentive program. She is correct in requesting the legislature to lift the net metering cap immediately as an attachment to another bill and to establish an open process dueing the next legislative session for all solar stakeholders and ratepayers to develop solutions placing a pricetag on the true value of solar's costs and benefits to the grid.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.