Daily Hampshire Gazette - Established 1786
Cloudy
37°
Cloudy
Hi 41° | Lo 24°

Backstory

Amherst officials fight bid to discuss, possibly 'disavow' Shabazz memo; Regional School Committee to take up issue today in Pelham anyway

  • From left: School Committee member Amilcar Shabazz, Superintendent Maria Geryk and Amherst Regional High School Principal Mark Jackson
  • CAROL LOLLIS<br/>Amherst High School.

Trevor Baptiste’s attempts to post the meeting in the towns that make up the Amherst-Pelham Regional School district — Amherst, Pelham, Leverett and Shutesbury — were undermined Wednesday by chairman Lawrence O’Brien, who sent an email to the four town clerks saying that the meeting posting was an error and that it should be removed.

Only Amherst acquiesced and labeled the meeting “canceled” on its website, and then declined to repost it when asked to do so by Baptiste.

“Our town counsel advised us not to,” said Assistant Town Clerk Susan Audette, who asked for the legal opinion after finding herself in the middle of the dispute.

Baptiste called the meeting after learning that O’Brien and the chairmen of the two other School Committees that govern the schools in the Amherst district sent a memo to Amilcar Shabazz last week chastising him for referring to an unnamed student as a racist during a public meeting. They also sent a letter of apology to the student’s parents.

Baptiste questioned the chairmen’s right to take such action without getting their full boards’ consent at an open meeting. He has listed the agenda for his Monday meeting as “statement on School Equity Task Force controversy (vote) adjournment.”

It is to take place in the Pelham Library at 4 p.m.

Amherst Assistant Town Manager David Ziomek said the town’s attorney advised the town clerk’s office to defer to the Regional School Committee’s policy, available on the school department’s website. That policy states that agenda items be presented to the superintendent of schools or the committee chairman 48 in advance of a meeting for posting.

“That’s the level of involvement from the town’s standpoint, so that’s why the posting was removed,” he said in a telephone interview Friday. Ziomek is filling in for Town Manager John Musante, who was out of the office.

Leslie Bracebridge, Shutesbury’s town clerk, took a different tact. After receiving Baptiste’s and O’Brien’s dueling requests, she consulted with Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office and decided to list the meeting on the town’s website.

“The Open Meeting Law is silent on who has the authority to post meetings,” Bracebridge said she was told. That, coupled with the fact that it is illegal for municipal committee members to meet without notifying the public, persuaded her to go ahead.

“I have no authority to refuse to post a meeting,” she said Friday. “I will leave it up to the committee members to work out among themselves whether or not to attend or participate. I don’t need that on my shoulders.”

According to the attorney general’s office, it is up to each public body to decide how to schedule its meetings.

The Gazette was unable to reach the town clerks from Pelham or Leverett, but as of Friday afternoon, Monday’s meeting was posted in both towns.

Baptiste said he is attempting to get a quorum for the session. “I’m expecting that I will, but we’ll see.” He declined to discuss the issue further.

O’Brien’s views

In response to questions from the Gazette, O’Brien said in an email late Friday that he continues to believe the memo to Shabazz was justified.

He said it is his understanding that the agenda for the Monday meeting is to discuss and vote on a motion that the panel “disavow” the July 3 memo and express its support for the task force Shabazz leads.

O’Brien reiterated his view that Shabazz’s statements at the June 18 task force meeting were “profoundly harmful.” While O’Brien said he would be willing to sign a statement expressing support for the task force, as well as Shabazz’s leadership of it, he believes any step to disavow the memo “would be like saying that when a public official expresses harmful and inaccurate information about our students it’s of little consequence to the community.”

He added, “I am convinced that our memorandum has brought some measure of justice to the children in our school district who were harmed by Professor Shabazz’s statements ....”

O’Brien also said he believes the memo provided “a significant amount of legal and financial protection that has arisen from Professor Shabazz’s comments ... that risked violating both federal and state privacy rights of those same students.”

He said legal advice given the regional committee indicates that if it withdraws its memo, the action “would re-expose our district and individual committee member to significant legal liability. If we are to be good stewards of the public monies, this would be a very dangerous action to take.”

First request

Audette said she first received the request to post the meeting from Baptiste around 1:30 p.m. Wednesday. About 15 minutes later, she said, she received a call from Debbie Westmoreland, assistant to Amherst Superintendent Maria Geryk, who usually sends the town meeting notices. Audette said Westmoreland told her the meeting was posted in error. An hour after that, Audette said, she received an email from O’Brien repeating that the meeting was posted in error adding, “please cancel it.”

Later, she said, Baptiste called and asked that it be reposted. It was then that she decided to ask for guidance from the town’s legal counsel, Kopelman and Paige of Boston.

“We’re not going to go back and forth, back and forth. I said I wanted to get a second opinion.” The town’s attorney, she said, considered the issue more of a parliamentary procedure than law. While the Open Meeting Law does not specifically say who has the authority to direct a town clerk to post a meeting, it does make reference to the chair setting the agenda, as does the Regional School Committee’s policy.

Seeking explanation

In an interview earlier this week, Baptiste told the Gazette that he wanted to call the meeting to get O’Brien to explain his actions. And, he said, he wanted a quorum of the School Committee to decide how to handle the remarks made by Shabazz June 18 at a meeting of the Equity Task Force which Shabazz chairs.

In describing the attack of a white middle school student by three middle school students of color, which occurred in the spring, Shabazz is said to have referred to the victim as a racist. The memo said to Shabazz said that an investigation by school officials uncovered no evidence that the victim of the assault was racist. The three chairmen said the incident was widely known in the school community and Shabazz’s reference was harmful to the student.

The attack was not reported to police, who found out about it last week after the memo was sent to Shabazz. Police said school officials deferred to the victim’s parents’ wishes in not contacting them, even though school leaders said the student was “aggressively and seriously assaulted.”

Baptiste said Wednesday he believed it was proper for him to seek and post a meeting to discuss the controversy under the directives of the state’s Open Meeting Law, which makes it clear he cannot discuss an issue with fellow board members without public notification. “I can’t call up four members and go to their house and deliberate unless I call the clerk and invite the public. And that’s what I’m doing,” he said.

Debra Scherban can be reached at DScherban@gazettenet.com.

Related

TIMELINE: Amherst schools' year of racial tension

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Amherst schools have been the site of multiple racist assaults throughout the 2013-2014 school year.  Most of the vitriol has been aimed at Carolyn Gardner, a black math teacher who began teaching at Amherst Regional High School in September, 2013. She's been the target of graffiti and hateful notes.  Other incidents include racially-based bullying that led to a social media post that …

READ excerpts from the Amherst School Committee's letter of reprimand to the Equity Task Force over use of term 'racist'

Monday, July 7, 2014

Here are some excerpts from a letter to the Amherst Equity Task Force from the School Committee regarding the task force chairman Amilcar Shabazz using the term 'racist' in the context of an assault. The letter was sent to the task force on June 18, 2014. "The Chair spoke about an incident which occurred this spring when secondary students of …

College, schools unite for equity in Amherst

Monday, August 4, 2014

AMHERST — A partnership between the Amherst-Pelham Regional School District and Amherst College is creating a mentoring program in which racial issues will be confronted by elementary, secondary and college students in forums led by social justice educator Calvin Terrell. Terrell, whose Social Centric Institute is based in Phoenix, is returning to Amherst for 10 days in the coming school …

Legacy Comments7

Impala, get a grip! No one is saying that Mr. Shabazz, or any other town committee member, is beyond reproach. The issue, as I understand it, is that a member of the school committee was very publicly reprimanded by a minority of regional school committee members, without a clear process leading up to that public reprimand. Whether or not the reprimand has merit, the memo damages Mr. Shabazz's reputation, whilst incredibly drawing even more attention to the student who was alleged to be racist. If I were a member of any town committee, volunteering significant personal time and resources to contribute to the community, I, too, would have questions about the process by which the memo was broadcast to the public.

So if the memo had merit would you have supported sending it? Even if it may have :damaged" Mr. Shabazz's reputation? Secondly, you seem concerned that the memo drew "even more attention to the student". So your solution to the comment by Mr. Shabazz would be to sweep it under the rug to protect the student?

Mr. Baptiste, At your "meeting" please be sure to ask Amilcar to address the allegations that he lied when he told the ETF that superintendent Geryk refused to provide him with documents related to discipline disparity work, which she in fact she provide to him and all the SC members, and also his statement to the ETF that "If I were to ever try to enter the high school, Maria Geryk would have me arrested." Let's clear up this question about whether or not Amilcar lied about the superintendent to the ETF while acting in his role as school official and ETF chair.

The article says "Shutesbury's town clerk took a different tact." The mot juste is tack. It's a sailing term.

It's a mute point pretzelogic...for all intensive purposes, this paid writer got her meaning across.

OK, so it's a "moot point" and "for all intents and purposes." Nothin' like the smell of poor grammar early in the morning...

It's OK for everyone else's back to be put up against the wall for the last 10 months, however Baptiste says Shabazz is "beyond reproach" for any of his actions. Well aren't we all lucky to have him walking amongst us.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.