Backlash for breast cancer charity over Planned Parenthood cuts
NEW YORK - The renowned breast cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure faced an escalating backlash Thursday over its decision to cut breast screening grants to Planned Parenthood. Some of Komen's local affiliates are openly upset, including all seven in California, and at least one top official has quit, reportedly in protest.
Meanwhile, Komen has been deluged with negative emails and Facebook postings, accusing it of knuckling under to pressure from anti-abortion groups, since The Associated Press reported on Tuesday that it was halting grants that Planned Parenthood affiliates used for breast exams and related services. The grants totaled $680,000 last year.
Planned Parenthood has been heartened by an outpouring of support in response to the cutoff. Besides $400,000 in smaller donations from 6,000 people, it is receiving $250,000 from a family foundation in Dallas and a $250,000 pledge announced Thursday by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to match future donations.
In Washington, 26 U.S. senators - all Democrats except for independent Bernie Sanders, of Vermont - signed a letter calling on Komen to reconsider its decision.
"It would be tragic if any woman - let alone thousands of women - lost access to these potentially lifesaving screenings because of a politically motivated attack," the senators wrote.
Komen's top leaders, in their first news conference since the controversy erupted, denied Planned Parenthood's assertion that the decision was driven by pressure from anti-abortion groups.
"We don't base our funding decisions ... on whether one side or the other will be pleased," said Komen's founder and CEO, Nancy Brinker, depicting the criticism as a mischaracterization of the charity's goals and mission.
Komen has said the decision stemmed from newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations under investigation - affecting Planned Parenthood because of an inquiry by a Republican congressman acting with encouragement from anti-abortion activists.
Brinker said Thursday that there were additional factors, notably changes in the types of breast-health service providers it wanted to support. However, she said grants would continue this year to three of the 19 Planned Parenthood affiliates - in Denver, California's Orange County, and Waco, Texas - because they served clientele with few other breast-screening options.
A source with direct knowledge of decision-making at Komen's headquarters in Dallas gave a different account, saying the grant-making criteria were adopted with the deliberate intention of targeting Planned Parenthood. The criteria's impact on Planned Parenthood and its status as the focus of government investigations were highlighted in a memo distributed to Komen affiliates in December.
According to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of repercussions, a driving force behind the move was Karen Handel, who was hired by Komen last year as vice president for public policy after losing a campaign for governor in Georgia in which she stressed her anti-abortion views and frequently denounced Planned Parenthood.
Brinker, in an interview with MSNBC, said Handel didn't have a significant role in the policy change.
The source also said that Mollie Williams, who had been Komen's director of community health programs, had resigned in protest over the grant cutoff.
Williams, in an email, said she could not comment on her departure for reasons of professional confidentiality, but she was clear about her views.
"I have dedicated my career to fighting for the rights of the marginalized and underserved," she wrote. "And I believe it would be a mistake for any organization to bow to political pressure and compromise its mission."
Williams said she was saddened by the rift because she admired both Komen and Planned Parenthood.
"I am hopeful their passionate and courageous leaders, Nancy Brinker and Cecile Richards, can swiftly resolve this conflict in a manner that benefits the women they both serve."
Among Komen's affiliates, there were clear signs of discomfort with the decision. The Connecticut branch received scores of supportive emails after expressing frustration about the cutoffs and good will toward Planned Parenthood.
All seven Komen affiliates in California, in a joint letter to their congressional delegation, said they were "strongly opposed" to the policy change and were working to overturn it.
"Our commitment to our mission is unwavering," the letter said. "This is a misstep in that journey and ... we will do whatever it takes to do what is right for the health of women and men in California."
In New York City, a member of the Komen affiliate's medical advisory board said she would resign if the decision wasn't changed soon.
"Komen is a wonderful organization and does tremendous things for women, but this is straying from their mission," said Dr. Kathy Plesser, a radiologist. "It's sad."
The board of the Arkansas affiliate issued a statement noting that the decision was made at Komen headquarters "without input from affiliates," and called for the new policy to be changed.
"We hope Komen national will reverse its position on granting to organizations under investigation because we feel decisions of this nature should be made only after the investigation is complete," the statement said.
At the Orange County affiliate in Costa Mesa, Calif., executive director Lisa Wolter said there have been lots of exchanges with headquarters.
"We're very troubled by the reaction, and we want to make sure there are clarifications," she said.
The American Association of University Women, in protest over Komen's decision, said it was scrapping plans to offer a Komen Race for the Cure as one of the activities at its upcoming National Conference for College Women Student Leaders.
"AAUW is disappointed that some are playing politics with women's health and jeopardizing care for the most vulnerable among us," said Lisa Maatz, the association's director of public policy.
According to Planned Parenthood, its health centers performed more than 4 million breast exams over the past five years, including nearly 170,000 as a result of Komen grants.
Though comments posted on Komen's Facebook page seemed to be mostly critical of the grant decision, Brinker said at her news conference that donations to the charity had increased since Tuesday.
She also said there were other organizations receiving Komen grants, in addition to Planned Parenthood, that might be adversely affected by the new criteria about investigations, but she did not identify them.
Online - Susan G. Komen for the Cure: http://ww5.komen.org/
Planned Parenthood: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/









Comments
Wow, Gary
As a breast cancer survivor, this funding was not to fund abortions. Whatever side anyone is on (I am on woman's choice side),this really should not have anything to do with abortions.
I did not have a mammogram for 5 years, until I was almost 45, because my job did not include health insurance and I felt that I couldn't justify the cost. Only after I found lumps was I scared enough to go and get one- out of pocket. My doctor had asked me to have one for years. You cannot imagine what I went through the day I finally had one and had the radiologist calling me in and redoing my mammo 4 times, telling me I might have cancer. I still remember the radiologist coming out to talk to me twice. I did have cancer. If there had been low cost options for me, I might have had one earlier and been able to forego years of debilitating treatment.
Gary, call a spade a spade - this is only about mammograms, not abortion.
On another hand, I did have an abortion once - the father was in Vietnam, exposed to Agent Orange and had prostate cancer. We were told initially that he was infertile - at the end after I became pregnant, the VA geneticist told us that if the baby was not born with cancer because of his treatments, the baby had a 75% chance of having thyroid cancer and dying within the first 2 years a horrible and painful death. What were you have done? I tried to commit suicide afterward. I now know that I lived for a reason and that I did the most humane thing ever - my baby never suffered.
Partial Birth Abortion
The Discovery channel used to show operations. I'd like them to show a partial birth abortion. Since the culture of death crowd thinks abortion is no different than evacuating yourself of digestive waste they should not have a problem with showing this video would they! Lets see the gory details as the fetus has its brain crushed, it squirms in agony as it dies and its body parts are diced and sliced and then suctioned out (all this and Planned Parenthood makes a profit on it too - how wonderfull for the purveyors of death). I want it in Prime Time!!!
Oh for the love of God!
Keep your Pro-life, anti-abortion politics out of this! That's how this mess happened in the first place! Plain and simple, SJK took funding for mammograms away from the poor who cannot other wide afford them. All in the name of loud mouth, anti-abortion politics. This isn't about abortion!! This is about cancer prevention! I hope you're happy with yourself. You just put the lives of the unborn over the lives of adult women. Women with families. Do you know what that makes you? A HYPOCRITE!
Culture of Death
You are a purveyor of death. You support the brutal murder of unborn people. Maybe you don't understand, the money PP got for breast screenings offset money they would spend to perform abortions. Money is fungible unless you can't grasp that? Money for mamograms, money for abortion- it goes in the same pot once it gets to PP. I love seeing the violent anger in your tone. Obviously you know how immorral your stance is. Wake up, join the human life movement. Celebrate life, not death.
Getting back to my original question would you mind seeing a live partial birth abortion performed on TV?
Gary
I'm not going to feed your fire. Your views are your views. I do not feel that my stance on abortion is immoral, and I am Catholic.
Just for the record, I have seen partial birth abortions on television, numerous times. It isn't pretty, and I would not have one, but just because that is my choice for my body, does not give me the right to make that choice for anyone else. Women have their reasons, and their choices are none of my business.
I will continue to support Planned Parenthood, because they offer cancer screenings to those who cannot afford them otherwise. I also fully support their programs for contraceptives.
See you at mass this Sunday.