School district says 'Nuts!' to nuts: Frontier taking peanuts out of schools

1

Photo: School district says 'Nuts!' to nuts: Frontier district taking peanuts out of schools
AP PHOTO
The Frontier Regional and Union 38 School District is moving to establish a complete ban on peanut and tree nut products at its five schools, in a move administrators say is aimed at preventing student exposure to potential life threatening allergies.

DEERFIELD - Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches will be a thing of the past for students at the Frontier Regional and Union 38 School District this year. Or at least the peanut butter will be.

The district is moving to establish a complete ban on peanut and tree nut products at its five schools, in a move administrators say is aimed at preventing student exposure to potential life threatening allergies. The items the school is looking to ban include peanut butter, any product with peanut oil as an ingredient, any product with peanuts of any kind as an ingredient and tree nuts, such as almonds or walnuts.

"Parents will be disappointed they can't send (a peanut butter sandwich), but it is a life-and-death matter and we are not going to be flexible with this," said Louise Law, interim principal at Deerfield Elementary. "To me it's simple - it's about keeping children safe. That's my first job. If we can't keep them safe, we can't educate them.

Frontier is not alone in establishing what administrators call a "nut safe" policy. Nationally, a growing number of school districts are implementing such measures as a means of keeping their students safe from food allergies. In the Valley, William E. Norris Elementary School in Southampton implemented a nut safe policy in 2006 while Westhampton Elementary School is currently considering a similar plan. Hampshire Regional High School now has a peanut-free zone in the cafeteria and does not serve peanut or tree nut products.

Sam Nugen, an assistant professor of food science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said researchers are unsure why the number of individuals with potentially lethal food allergies is growing.

"One reason that it seems to be more prevalent is that it is being diagnosed more, with all of the attention it has been receiving, although that does not account for all of the increase," Nugen said.

Individuals are not allergic to the peanuts themselves, but proteins that occur naturally in the nuts, Nugen said. Some individuals might be allergic to one of the nut's proteins, but not another, while for someone else the reverse could be true, he said.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is currently studying how to confront the growing number of food allergies from the standpoint of food processors, Nugen said. The agency is working to develop a strategy to combat a growing number of people who are allergic to eggs, fish, milk, peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish and soy, he said. Private companies are taking note as well and are increasingly prone to advertise "school safe" products that do not contain peanut products, Nugen said.

The UMass professor said he supported the ban on peanut products from schools as a short-term solution. Better, he argues, that a remedy in the food processing system be identified to combat the issue.

"For people who don't have these severe allergies, they tend to see (peanut bans) as overreacting," Nugen said. "The number of people who would go into anaphylactic shock is very small, but for those people who are susceptible it could be lethal, even with a small amount of exposure."

At Hampshire Regional High School, a number of tables in the cafeteria have been identified as a nut-free zone, said Superintendent Craig Jurgensen. He said the tables are washed multiple times daily to prevent students with allergies from coming into contact with peanut products. Westhampton, another school in his district, is looking to establish a nut-safe policy prior to the start of the school year, Jurgensen said.

"We're doing it as we find kids with those allergies, school by school," Jurgensen said. The district comprises the towns of Chesterfield, Goshen, Southampton, Westhampton and Williamsburg.

Bill Collins, principal at William E. Norris, acknowledged that the nut-safe policy was controversial when it was implemented at his school four years ago. However, he said he felt the ban was necessary and had proven successful in keeping students safe. No serious reactions have occurred since the ban went into place, he said.

"The children accepted it right away and the staff accepted it right away. It took a little longer for some of the parents and maybe some still struggle with it," Collins said. "The children have an innate sense of justice and what is fair. Now the children will say to a parent when they are making lunch, 'Dad I can't bring that (to school).'"

Collins said he has received a number of calls from area school administrators inquiring about his school's nut-safe policy.

Law, the Deerfield principal, said that in the past her school has seen the number of impacted students grow from a few individuals in select classes to students in nearly every grade of the school. Deerfield also has students with the most severe and rare form of peanut allergies, Law said, in which the affected person can have an allergic reaction just by sitting next to someone who is eating a peanut butter sandwich, for instance. The individual with the allergy can inhale the fumes from peanut butter and potentially have a life-threatening reaction, she said.

Mere contact with a peanut product can be similarly problematic, she said. For instance, a student who touches a keyboard previously used by a person who had touched a granola bar could have a serious skin reaction, she said.

Regina Nash, Frontier Regional and Union 38 superintendant, said she would be making a proposal to install a nut-safe policy at each of the district's five schools: Frontier Regional High School and Middle School, Conway Grammar School, Deerfield Elementary, Sunderland Elementary and Whately Elementary. The school committees for each of those schools will discuss the bans in September and vote on them in October, Nash said.

The Deerfield School Committee is slated to meet this Wednesday at 7 p.m. at the elementary school to discuss the issue.

"We are not looking to penalize anyone; we are looking to make sure our schools are safe for everyone," Nash said. "We have a minority of students who have an allergy and we just want to make sure that they, too, have a safe learning environment."

Comments

What about milk allergies?

What about milk allergies? What about egg allergies? What about wheat allergies? If you are going to single out one, we must think of the others, right? Let's make a table for each and segregate all children, each to their own table... This comes back to, "think before you speak".

Try a little thinking before writing

None of those allergies are considered contact allergies. A person with a milk allergy is not going to go into shock that is life threating by exposure to dairy products
Geeesh

Ignorant Comments

Let me clear something up for those of you who are not well versed on peanut allergies.

1) I fed my child everything and anything he would eat and never once worried about food allergies prior to his first reaction. So abstinence of certain foods was NOT the cause.

2) I never used hand sanitizers or was fanatical about hand washing when my child was little not to mention my house is not hospital clean by any means (who's would be by child #3?) So there goes that theory.

3) Why "punish" everybody? Would you feel that way if my child brought a loaded gun to school? Because to my child, peanuts ARE a loaded gun!

4) "To protect the few"???? Are you kidding? Your comment infuriates me the most! I am speechless on that one.

Until you have rushed your child to the hospital, watched them turned blue because their throat is closing up at 2 years old and they are nearly lifeless because they can not breathe, you can not possibly understand the helplessness you feel as a parent nor the frustration at the selfishness of other people who feel they are being "punished" because of one stupid peanut & butter jelly sandwich.

The punishment is the poor child who at the slightest exposure to nuts knows they can die in SECONDS. This is no joke. Believe me when I say that we did not ask for this curse nor did my child. We deal with it every second of every day and I do not expect everyone to understand or to accomodate us. We have a very well aware child who knows to avoid a lot of foods. But do not post publicly how you are being punished.

Peanut-Free Zone

Why punish everyone...? Simply designate a "nut-free zone" in the lunchroom...duh...

what I have been told

This is what I have been told. The allergy is not to the peanut itself but to the mold that grows with the peanuts. It is also that they use peanuts for so many things that the ground they grow in does not have time to rest and "heal" because it is massively harvested all the time. Look up George Washington Carver.

My daughter goes to Norris school. She does not like peanut butter but I think the policy is a bit overboard.

My question is what if a kid has peanut butter for breakfast? How horrible they would feel if something happened to a friend at school. So should we not eat peanut butter at home either? Or how do these parents take their kids out in public anywhere from the grocery store to the playground?

I certainly don't want anyone to get ill or have an adverse reaction or worse but really.....

Unfair

I'm just wondering what about the child that only eats peanut butter and jelly? My son is entering the 4th grade and it is the only thing he will eat. My son being a very picky eater also eats walnuts and other nuts as it is how he's pediatrician ensures that he is getting his protien and Iron. He's not alone. Does he get to starve? I agree with Uncle Wally we don't expose ourselves to alot of things as well as don't feed them to our children unil certain ages and then we wonder why so many things are becoming an issue.
My son has 2 friend with peanut allergies and in working with their parents we are able to create saftey and satisfaction without not feedingmy child or harming there's. It also helps that they took the parenting responsibilty and taught their children what to watch out for and look for in foods and they also are very aware of there surroundings. But go us punish those in school because of those parents who don't do their jobs and would be the first to blame the school when something happens to their child. I'm just reminded I'm happy to haveopted private school where kids are disciplined and parents are held responsible and you can have nuts.

Silly

Let's ban everything people can be allergic to. No wheat products!

Very ridiculous.

Just the latest thing for our liberal educators to be all 'concerned' about and rally the troops around. 'Peanut-free tables', meaning the allergic kids have to sit alone and apart, is apartheid! Wait until they figure that one out and watch and laugh as they fumble around and try to make some big campaign about 'tolerance for the allergic' or whatever. That will give them something to do and be 'concerned' about next year.

I think the reason more kids are allergic to everything these days is because their parents and the schools constantly douse them in hand sanitizer and make them wash their hands 85 times per day. Sorry, but if you want a healthy immune system, you need to expose it to things so it can practice fighting. Otherwise, it will be unnaturally fragile.
I wash my hands after I use the bathroom or do grubby hands-on work, but not much more than that. I haven't had so much as a cold in years. I grew up getting dirty outside before the days of Facespace and hand sanitizer (not by much, I'm still young), and I'm not allergic to anything- nor are any of my friends I grew up catching frogs and getting dirty outside with.

A bit ridiculous?

Is banning a healthy food choice for the entire population really a good solution to protect a few? Shouldn't they be learning about their allergies and how to deal with them anyways? I really doubt that they'll be able to convince everyone they meet in their future to not have any peanut products around. Should we spray our cities to kill off the bees to save children with bee allergies as well?

Copyright Notice | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Help Center | FAQ | Subscribe to the Gazette | Advertising
Daily Hampshire Gazette © 2011 All rights reserved