A haven offered
Amherst votes to welcome pair of Guantanamo detainees
Thursday, November 5, 2009AMHERST - Captives long held by the United States at Guantanamo Bay could be welcome to move to Amherst.
Town Meeting Wednesday called on Congress to repeal the ban on allowing cleared detainees to live in the United States and then moved to invite two such detainees, once cleared, to come to Amherst.
The petition article, brought forward by Pioneer Valley No More Guantanamos, won widespread support from Town Meeting.
Meg Gage of Precinct 1 spoke in favor of the article. "The cruelty carried out at Guantanamo has been well documented," Gage said.
Gage said Town Meeting's support is essential to both national integrity and personal accountability because of the unjust imprisonment of more than 800 people.
Select Board member Gerry Weiss spoke in favor of granting asylum to cleared detainees. "At the heart of this request is, people are suffering, and suffering unjustly," Weiss said.
Weiss said he believes the vote can help undo some of the damage the federal government has done in the name of Amherst taxpayers. "We must do what we can to make amends," Weiss said.
Select Board Chairwoman Stephanie O'Keeffe disagreed, saying Town Meeting doesn't have expertise to offer meaningful guidance to Washington, and is concerned that Amherst is being portrayed as creating a safe haven for terrorists. Even if only perception, it reflects poorly on the town, and is a reason she couldn't support the article.
"But we must recognize our actions, and symbolic acts, can be interpreted in many ways," O'Keeffe said.
Stan Gawle of Precinct 2 said he has a problem with the article because he has read news stories that cleared detainees have gone back to killing American soldiers.
Carol Gray of Precinct 8 urged Town Meeting to support the article. "This is not our criminal justice system as we know it. This is an outrage," Gray said.
Ruth Hooke of Precinct 8, the lead petitioner, said it is also a means of changing policy. Though President Obama had said the base would close in 2010, pressure has been building to keep it open because of public fears about where detainees, both those who are cleared and those who are not, would be able to live.
The article doesn't commit the town to any money to house, educate or otherwise assist the detainees, if they do come to Amherst.
The two men who are the focus of Amherst's efforts are Ahmed Belbacha, a native of Algeria, and Ravil Mingazov, originally from Russia. Belbacha has already been cleared by the State Department and Pentagon, while Mingazov is awaiting his habeas corpus hearing
Town Meeting members also received a formal letter of support from Gage, who explained why it is a local matter worthy of being addressed.
Gage calls it "consistent with Amherst's tradition of welcoming refugees from other parts of the world and building bridges of understanding between Amherst and many far-away places" and noting the support western Massachusetts once gave to the Underground Railroad for those fleeing slavery, and now gives to exiled Tibetans.
Gage also said she believes Amherst can provide opportunities for these men to begin the healing process and regain their lives.
"There are not many communities in this country where this kind of welcome would be possible. By taking them in, we will demonstrate that in at least one local community Americans want to begin the personal healing process after a decade of fear- and hate-mongering."
The two-part article passed on a voice vote.
Town Meeting also got a letter of support from attorneys with Reprieve, a London-based organization representing Belbacha.
Scott Merzbach can be reached at smerzbach@gazettenet.com.











Comments
I guess the Amherst Taxpayers will be footing the bill.
Weiss said he believes the vote can help undo some of the damage the federal government has done in the name of Amherst taxpayers. "We must do what we can to make amends," Weiss said.
Read the warrant article
The "advisory" article overwhelmingly passed by Amherst Town Meeting last night did NOT contain any individual names at all; and the word "cleared" appeared FOUR times.
If we can't trust our Federal government to investigate and clear potential terrorists then how can we trust them to prevent another 9/11?
http://www.onlyintherepublicofamherst.blogspot.com/
Fleeing slaves and exiled Tibetians?
I hardley think you can compare fleeing slaves and exiled Tibetans to terrorists who have no respect for human life including those of you who think this is a good idea.
yes, they are afraid to go home
All you have to do is google their names and read. Or click the links I provided earlier.
Then you would learn that both men were accused of attending terrorist training camps in Pakistan and Uzbekistan to receive training in the use of firearms, explosives, and chemical weapons.
Other countries are quick to punish (either officially or unofficially) suspected criminals , while we refrain until we have proof of their guilt. Both of these men fear a return to their home lands would mean certain torture and eventual death.
The town of Amherst wants its citizens to belive that these men never were, or are no longer, a threat to Americans. They want us to greet them with trust, compassion, and understanding, when their own countrymen will not.
The burden of proof is with the town. They are not doing a very good job of providing information that would allow the general public to adopt this same altruistic spirit.
Instead, Amherst continues in its attempt to show itself off as the ultimately politically correct town, and shove this article down the throats of its citizens by wagging a finger and saying "Shame on you if you don't agree."
Tell the people of Amherst (and surrounding towns) what these men were accused of, what they really did / did not do, and guarantee that their presence here will never jeopardize the safety of a single person.
Then, and only then should the town go forward with any action on this article.
More Proof of Innocence
There are some proud vets in Amherst that have served and before the Select Board voted there should have been much more information shared that these two individuals were COMPLETELY innocent of ALL of the allegations. The Select Board owes it to the community and the vets in Amherst.I agree with what they're trying to do but they needed to cover bases first. If these guys did have anything AT ALL to do with training to fire weapons or anything of the nature than the vote was a bad mistake.
A Haven Offered
Does it occur to the good people of Amherst that these detainees may want to go back to their own country and be with their families rather than seek haven in Amherst after their released. I'd want to go home after such an ordeal.
Home
I believe these people haven't been sent home because they wouldn't be welcome there, both because of their ethnic background and the suspicion of them being terrorist/not terrorists where they came from.
Say it out loud then think if it makes sense
They aren't welcome back home and yet they are here?
A little background on these guys
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Belbacha
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/290-ahmed-bin-saleh-bel...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravil_Mingazov
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/702-ravil-mingazov
Post new comment